nanog mailing list archives
Re: VPLS Providers
From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura () ericsson com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:55:53 +0000
In 2016 we will start seeing first massive EVPN deployments. If you really need L2 with multihoming and BGP FRR speeds in service recovery - look for EVPN, otherwise, as mentioned below - L3 is your friend. Regards, Jeff
On Jan 1, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote: Chris Burwell wrote:I've had enough trouble with broadcast storms and other issues in N.A.And you still want vpls? Wow. If you're talking a requirement for connecting geographically separated locations, there are sound technical reasons for avoiding vpls like the plague. Unless there are overriding technical reasons why it wouldn't work, l3vpn will almost always provide a far better quality service. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: VPLS Providers Mike Hammett (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: VPLS Providers Nick Hilliard (Jan 01)
- Re: VPLS Providers Jeff Tantsura (Jan 01)
- Re: VPLS Providers Mark Tinka (Jan 04)
- Re: VPLS Providers Christopher Morrow (Jan 04)
- Re: VPLS Providers Mark Tinka (Jan 06)
- Re: VPLS Providers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 01)