nanog mailing list archives
Re: Leap Second planned for 2016
From: A.L.M.Buxey () lboro ac uk
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 19:09:08 +0000
Hi,
Leap second handling code is not well-tested and is an ultimate corner case. There's been debate about abolishing leap seconds; with all the
well, we've gone through a few of these now...so if it was all okay before its likely to be again... exception: any NEW code that you are running since last time - THAT hasnt been tested ;-) alan
Current thread:
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016, (continued)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Javier J (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Andrew Kirch (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Hal Ponton (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Eric Tykwinski (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Andrew Kirch (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Jared Mauch (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Saku Ytti (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Harlan Stenn (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Chris Adams (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Eric S. Raymond (Jul 09)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 A . L . M . Buxey (Jul 09)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Falsehoods programmers believe about time, etc (was Re: Leap Second planned for 2016) Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 10)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Javier J (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 09)
- RE: Leap Second planned for 2016 Keith Medcalf (Jul 09)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Saku Ytti (Jul 10)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Steve Allen (Jul 10)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 10)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Jimmy Hess (Jul 10)