nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 deployment excuses
From: Denis Fondras <xxnog () ledeuns net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:46:35 +0200
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:49:40AM -0600, William Astle wrote:
it usually boils down to "we don't want to put any effort or resources into updating anything".
And they must be right as their clients won't go away... :p
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Matt Hoppes (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Gary Wardell (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Alarig Le Lay (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Hugo Slabbert (Jul 01)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Gary Wardell (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ruairi Carroll (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses William Astle (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Denis Fondras (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ruairi Carroll (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ruairi Carroll (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Tore Anderson (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Tore Anderson (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 04)