nanog mailing list archives
Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:07:27 -0500 (CDT)
Before 100G, you'd need ten cross connects to move 100G. Now you'd need only one. That's a big drop in revenue. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brandon Butterworth" <brandon () rd bbc co uk> To: bross () pobox com, dave () temk in Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 8:55:57 AM Subject: Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Dave Temkin <dave () temk in> wrote:
And as colo operators get freaked out over margin compression on the impending 10->100G conversion (which is happening exponentially faster than 100->1G & 1G->10G) they'll need to move those levers of spend around regardless.
If they've based their model on extracting profit proportional to technology speed then they've misunderstood Moore's law brandon
Current thread:
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Dave Temkin (Jun 19)
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Mike Hammett (Jun 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Brandon Butterworth (Jun 19)
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Mike Hammett (Jun 19)
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh jim deleskie (Jun 19)
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 19)
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh David Barak via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 19)
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Joe Hamelin (Jun 20)
- Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh Mike Hammett (Jun 19)