nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea+nanog () grid kiae ru>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:05:44 +0300
Rubens, good day. Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:32:29PM -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well over 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference corroborating studies from Linkedin and Facebook.Says the company that consistently refused to dual-stack its customers by default...
What's your point? Does their technical reasoning or proving grounds for it lacking the needed expertise/experience due to the problems you're describing? Any other thigs you can say about the actual study? -- Eygene Ryabinkin, National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute" Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Christopher Morrow (Jun 07)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Leo Bicknell (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Hugo Slabbert (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Jeff McAdams (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Christopher Morrow (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Jeff McAdams (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 John Levine (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 William Herrin (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Ca By (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Eygene Ryabinkin (Jun 02)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Ca By (Jun 06)
- Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4 Mark Tinka (Jun 06)