nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port?
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:04:11 -0700
On Wed 2016-Jun-01 12:58:15 -0500, Jason Lee <jason.m.lee () gmail com> wrote:
NANOG Community, Typically where would you expect a service provider to monitor bandwidth usage on your circuits? On the physical switch port interface or on the vlan interface at the router? In some of the field testing I've been doing there can be a difference in the bandwidth usage on the vlan interface at the router vs the physical switch port. Is there any particular reason for using one vs the other? Is there an industry best practice for this?
How big of a difference? Full frame / L2 (@ switch) vs. L3 payload (@ router)?
Thanks, Jason
-- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo () slabnet com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Jason Lee (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Spencer Ryan (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Hugo Slabbert (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Mel Beckman (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Mark Tinka (Jun 01)