nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper MX Sizing
From: Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:35:09 -0500
Mark, You are right that makes sense. So as a recap, you were seeing about 45 seconds route convergence time using RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM. For a MX104 it took 4min 25sec. I assume a MX80 would be even slower than an MX104. What about a MX480 with RE-2000's with 4GB of ram? Does anyone have any stats on that? I would assume faster than a MX104 but slower than the RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
On 14/Mar/16 04:02, Colton Conor wrote:Brad, Did you ever get the numbers for the MX480?I would not expect a difference in performance for the MX480 vis a vis the MX960 using the same RE's, MPC's and SCB's. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Colton Conor (Mar 13)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Mark Tinka (Mar 13)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Colton Conor (Mar 14)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Mark Tinka (Mar 14)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Colton Conor (Mar 14)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Mark Tinka (Mar 13)