nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST NTP servers
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem () rellim com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 17:56:51 -0700
Yo Scott! On Wed, 11 May 2016 17:42:34 -0700 "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
If all logs are sent to a unix server that does syslogd the log entries would go into the file in order no matter what timestamp is on them.syslogd can have quite large buffers. --------------------------------------- Wouldn't the buffers empty in a FIFO manner?
Nope, each local syslog waits until its local buffer is full, or timed out, then sends to the main syslog server. The default flush_timeout() for syslog-ng is 10 seconds. That is a long time when debugging SIP. http://www.syslog.org/syslog-ng/v2/ RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 gem () rellim com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Attachment:
_bin
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: NIST NTP servers, (continued)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Andreas Ott (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Jay R. Ashworth (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Majdi S. Abbas (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Jared Mauch (May 12)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mike (May 12)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Gary E. Miller (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Eygene Ryabinkin (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Gary E. Miller (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Lyndon Nerenberg (May 11)