nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST NTP servers
From: George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 21:38:16 -0700
On May 11, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote: ... You're replacing one single point of failure with another. Personally, my network gets NTP from 14 stratum 1 sources right now. You, and the hacker, do not know which ones. You have to guess at least 8 to get me to move to your "hacked" time. Good luck.
...except for people who think that N internet only servers is enough redundancy. Pretty much anything with unfiltered outbound could put out enough forged UDP to effectively jam ALL the Stratum 1 servers for a given endpoint. George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone
Current thread:
- Re: NIST NTP servers, (continued)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Lamar Owen (May 14)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Laszlo Hanyecz (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Chuck Anderson (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Sharon Goldberg (May 13)
- RE: NIST NTP servers John Souvestre (May 12)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Chris Adams (May 12)
- RE: NIST NTP servers John Souvestre (May 12)
- RE: NIST NTP servers Chuck Church (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers George Herbert (May 12)
- RE: NIST NTP servers Allan Liska (May 11)
- RE: NIST NTP servers Chuck Church (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mike (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Laszlo Hanyecz (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Harlan Stenn (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Gary E. Miller (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Jared Mauch (May 10)