nanog mailing list archives

Re: NIST NTP servers


From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 14:38:58 +0000

Lamar,

You make it sound like TXCOs are rare, but they're actually quite common in most single board computers. True, you're 
probably not gonna find them in the $35 cellular-based SBCs, but since these temperature compensated oscillators cost 
less than a dollar each in quantity, they're quite common in most industrial species for well under $100.

An Ovenized XCO is absolutely not required for IT-grade NTP servers. If you need sub-microsecond  low-jitter 
leading-edge clocks, for BITS timing of SONET or radio networks for example, then an OXCO is helpful. But NTP itself is 
not that accurate. NTP can usually maintain time to only within tens of milliseconds over the public Internet, and can 
only achieve better than one millisecond accuracy in local area networks under ideal conditions. 

 -mel 

On May 13, 2016, at 7:13 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu> wrote:

On 05/11/2016 09:46 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
maybe try [setting up an NTP server] with an odroid?

...

I have several ODroid C2's, and the first thing to note about them is that there is no RTC at all.  Also, the 
oscillator is just a garden-variety non-temperature-compensated quartz crystal, and not necessarily a very precise 
one, either (precise quartz oscillators can cost more than the whole ODroid board costs).  The XU4 and other ODroid 
devices make nice single-board ARM computers, but have pretty ratty oscillator precision.

You really have to have at least a temperature compensated quartz crystal oscillator (TCXO) to even begin to think 
about an NTP server, for anything but the most rudimentary of timing.  Ovenized quartz oscillators (OCXO) and 
rubidium standards are the next step up, and most reasonably good GPS-disciplined clocks have at least an ovenized 
quartz oscillator module (the Agilent Z3816 and kin are of this type).



Current thread: