nanog mailing list archives
RE: B5-Lite
From: Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 12:28:11 -0500
AF24HD can do full duplex 1Gbps On May 14, 2016 12:17 PM, "Eric Rogers" <ecrogers () precisionds com> wrote:
If it is 3-4KM, I would definitely use the AF24 (24GHz) because it gives you 750M/750M Full duplex. For longer, or a backup link, I would use the AF5X (not AF5) instead of the B5. That way you have 750M full duplex during most days with the AF24, and on a strong rain if you use OSPF, the AF5X (5GHz) can at least carry 100Mish across until the rain stops. Eric Rogers PDS Connect www.pdsconnect.me (317) 831-3000 x200 -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Spencer Ryan Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 9:46 AM To: Jared Mauch Cc: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: B5-Lite I didn't think the AF5 was much cheaper than an AF24 and I'd much rather be up in the 24GHz band and out of any contention in 5GHz. *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sryan () arbor net *Arbor Networks* +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m) www.arbornetworks.com On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:Ouch. Was also looking at b5 but $1400 for a pair is a bit steep if your effective range won't support a "short" 3-4km link. Trying to bridge the gap, and UBNT has their pluses and minuses. Maybe AF5X instead I guess. Thanks! Jared MauchOn May 14, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Hal Ponton <hal () buzcom net> wrote: We've deployed 2 B5 links into production, the newer firmware seems tohave fixed the issues we saw in the links when we first tested them.We have a very rural customer where two hops are needed around thesite.We're lucky in that we had two 80MHz channels free. We see around 350Mbps both ways actual throughput on both links.However, these links are short est. 200mtrs when we had tested these onlonger links their performance was awful, on a 40MHz channel we saw20Mbps.For our longer links that need a bit more throughput than a Rocket M5 weeither use Licensed radios or the AF5X which works very well.Regards, Hal Ponton Senior Network Engineer Buzcom / FibreWiFiOn 14 May 2016, at 11:07, Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net> wrote:Jared - why not go to Ubiquiti AC gear if you need some more speed andsomething more modern?On May 14, 2016, at 01:43, Eric C. Miller <eric () ericheather com>wrote:B5c is the only product that I've had much success with from Mimosa. The B5Lite is a cheap plastic shell and, and it performs like it too. If you have UBNT gear now, Mimosa is a good next step, but I'dstrongly recommend that you stear away from the lite and go with the B5c. We use them with rocket dishes. You just need the RP-SMA to N cables.Eric Miller, CCNP Network Engineering Consultant -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 7:06 PM To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org> Subject: B5-Lite Anyone deployed this radio in production in the US? I’m curious tohear from people who are using it, looking at replacing some UBNT hardware with it on some PTP links, going from the M-series class devices to something more modern.Thanks, - Jared
Current thread:
- Re: B5-Lite, (continued)
- Re: B5-Lite Faisal Imtiaz (May 13)
- RE: B5-Lite Eric C. Miller (May 13)
- Re: B5-Lite Matt Hoppes (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Hal Ponton (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Jared Mauch (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Josh Luthman (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Josh Reynolds (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Spencer Ryan (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Josh Luthman (May 14)
- RE: B5-Lite Eric Rogers (May 14)
- RE: B5-Lite Josh Reynolds (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Matt Hoppes (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Mike Hammett (May 17)
- Re: B5-Lite Jared Mauch (May 17)
- Re: B5-Lite Mike Hammett (May 17)
- Re: B5-Lite Hal Ponton (May 17)
- Re: B5-Lite Jared Mauch (May 14)
- Re: B5-Lite Hal Ponton (May 14)