nanog mailing list archives
Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 23:38:48 +0200
On 24/May/16 06:29, Rob Laidlaw wrote:
Yes. Many vendors are using l2vpn/pseudo-wire services of one sort or another to provide circuits and most do not transport LACP by default.
To the OP's case, commercially, I'd find it interesting to transport a 100Gbps circuit as EoMPLS rather than EoDWDM, considering the amount of bandwidth one would need to throw at an IP/MPLS network to transport 100Gbps effectively... Mark.
Current thread:
- LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Colton Conor (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Jared Mauch (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Mark Tinka (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Rob Laidlaw (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Mark Tinka (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Eric Kuhnke (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Mark Tinka (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Jared Mauch (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Colton Conor (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Eygene Ryabinkin (May 24)