nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS Reference Designs
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 23:52:05 +0200
On 27/May/16 20:36, Alain Hebert wrote:
( Obviously interoperability is just ridiculous when talking MPLS... )
Why would you think so?
Too many times we ended up finding boxes that look the part but are limited in such a way to accomplish only the task that fit the vendor own MPLS paradigm. ( TLDR: Make us spend more $$$ than needed =D long gone is the swiss-knife concept )
What platforms have you worked on before that have caused you grief? Mark.
Current thread:
- Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Mohamed Kamal (May 27)
- RE: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Timothy Creswick (May 27)
- Re: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Mohamed Kamal (May 27)
- MPLS Reference Designs Alain Hebert (May 27)
- Re: MPLS Reference Designs Mark Tinka (May 27)
- Re: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Mark Tinka (May 27)
- Re: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Mohamed Kamal (May 27)
- RE: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Timothy Creswick (May 27)