nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute
From: Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon () cox net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 01:00:41 -0500
I am completely innocent of rfc1812, and have been out of the game for a long time, but I am pretty sure I was taught (and in turn taught) that a router would reply using the address of the interface that originated the reply unless that interface was unnumbered, in which case it would reply from the loop-back address.
Never too old to learn something. -- "Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid." --Albert Einstein From Larry's Cox account.
Current thread:
- rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Mikael Abrahamsson (May 30)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Larry Sheldon (May 30)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Job Snijders (May 31)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Owen DeLong (May 31)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute William Herrin (May 31)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Octavio Alvarez (May 31)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Hugo Slabbert (May 31)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute William Herrin (May 31)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Mikael Abrahamsson (May 30)