nanog mailing list archives
Re: Here we go again.
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg () tristatelogic com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 14:39:50 -0800
In message <1624203180.33527.1478724998723.JavaMail.zimbra () baylink com>, "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com> wrote:
The list is not the proper forum for a debate on this topic, and I'm not trying to start one. But ask yourself *now* what happens if you get these kinds of orders, so that you can give a reasoned answer. https://plus.google.com/+LaurenWeinstein/posts/TYxXkeQ2jPW
There are plenty of reasons for thinking people to be terrified today. I don't know why you've chosen to focus on such a small one. Here's a bigger one: http://bit.ly/2fTdmiG P.S. I agree completely that this is not the proper forum for either discussion or debate on these matters. But given that adherence to the ordinary rules of politness and proper decorum quite clearly did nothing, in the end, to prevent last night's outcome, I for one am willing to forgo them, within limits, e.g. when some of the elephants in the room become just too big to ignore.
Current thread:
- Here we go again. Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 09)
- RE: Here we go again. Naslund, Steve (Nov 09)
- Re: Here we go again. Mel Beckman (Nov 09)
- Re: Here we go again. Brielle Bruns (Nov 09)
- Re: Here we go again. Ronald F. Guilmette (Nov 09)
- Re: Here we go again. Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Here we go again. Bacon Zombie (Nov 10)
- Re: Here we go again. Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Here we go again. William Herrin (Nov 09)
- Re: Here we go again. Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 12)
- Re: Here we go again. Dovid Bender (Nov 12)
- Re: Here we go again. Arturo Servin (Nov 13)
- Re: Here we go again. Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 12)
- Re: Here we go again. Job Snijders (Nov 09)
- Re: Here we go again. Steven Fischer (Nov 09)