nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:35:51 +0200
On 10/Nov/16 14:30, Joel M Snyder wrote:
In a world where you are doing well-controlled Cisco/Juniper/etc networks with fairly homogeneous code bases, the engineers get to have this discussion. When you have to link in devices for which routing is not their primary reason to exist, your options narrow very quickly. It's not ideal; that's just the way it is.
Quagga's IS-IS implementation is a great example. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?, (continued)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Florian Weimer (Nov 11)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 11)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? John Kristoff (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Joel M Snyder (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Nick Hilliard (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? sthaug (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Dragan Jovicic (Nov 11)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 10)