nanog mailing list archives
Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11
From: Chris Boyd <cboyd () gizmopartners com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:42:05 -0500
On Oct 22, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote: "taken all necessary steps to insure that none of the numerous specific types of CCVT thingies that Krebs and others identified" Serious question... how?
Putting them behind a firewall without general Internet access seems to work for us. We have a lot of cheap IP cameras in our facility and none of them can reach the net. But this is probably a bit beyond the capabilities of the general home user. —Chris
Current thread:
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11, (continued)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ca By (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Eliot Lear (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ca By (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Eliot Lear (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ca By (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 John Levine (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Randy Bush (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Randy Bush (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Stephen Satchell (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Chris Boyd (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 jim deleskie (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Stephen Satchell (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Luke Guillory (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 jim deleskie (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Luke Guillory (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mel Beckman (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Peter Baldridge (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)