nanog mailing list archives
Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:16:13 +0200
* Randy Bush:
What does BCP38 have to do with this?nothing technical, as these iot attacks are not spoofed.
How do you know? Has anyone disclosed specifics? I can understand that keeping details under wraps is sometimes required for operational security, but if the attacks are clearly succeeding, I would have expected those who posted “do something, now!” messages at least some pointer to technical details of what was going on. Not that the underlying threat will go away until we find a way to clean up almost all of the compromised devices (and without breaking the Internet along the way, forever).
Current thread:
- Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ronald F. Guilmette (Oct 21)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Laszlo Hanyecz (Oct 21)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Paul Ferguson (Oct 21)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Randy Bush (Oct 21)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Paul Ferguson (Oct 21)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Randy Bush (Oct 21)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Florian Weimer (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 clinton mielke (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mel Beckman (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Victor Kuarsingh (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ronald F. Guilmette (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Laszlo Hanyecz (Oct 21)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Richard Irving (Oct 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ronald F. Guilmette (Oct 21)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Leo Bicknell (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)