nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:32:42 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Joe Klein wrote:
What would it take to test for BCP38 for a specific AS?
Well, you can get people to run https://www.caida.org/projects/spoofer/#software
I tried to get OpenWrt to include similar software, on by default, but some people are afraid that they might incur legal action on themselves by doing antispoofing-testing.
https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/tf/anti-spoofing might be of interest.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Stephen Satchell (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Jones (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Joe Klein (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Alain Hebert (Sep 28)
- RE: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? White, Andrew (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Hammett (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Wesley George (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Hammett (Sep 28)