nanog mailing list archives
nexus N3K-C3064PQ vs juniper ex4500 in order to protect against ddos
From: Pedro <piotr.1234 () interia pl>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 21:42:37 +0200
Hello, I have some idea to put switch before bgp router in order to terminate isp 10G uplinks on switch, not router. Main reason is that could be some kind of 1st level of defence against ddos, second reason, less important, save cost of router ports, do many port mirrors. I think about N3K-C3064PQ or Juniper ex4500 because there are quite cheap and a lot of on Ebay. I would like on nexus or juniper try use some feature: - limit udp, icmp, bum packets (bandwith,pps) at ingress tagged port or vlan - create counters: passed and dropped packets, best way to get this counters via snmp oid, sent snmp traps, syslog etc in order to monitor or even as a action shut down port - port mirror from many ports/vlans to multiple port (other anty ddos solutions) - limited bgp but with flowspec to comunicate with another anty ddos devices I'm also wondering how this feature above impact on cpu/whole switch. It can be some performance degradation ot all of this feature are done in hardware, with wirespeeed ? Which model will better to do this ? Thanks for any advice, Pedro --- Ta wiadomość została sprawdzona na obecność wirusów przez oprogramowanie antywirusowe Avast. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Current thread:
- nexus N3K-C3064PQ vs juniper ex4500 in order to protect against ddos Pedro (Sep 30)
- Re: nexus N3K-C3064PQ vs juniper ex4500 in order to protect against ddos Saku Ytti (Sep 30)
- Re: nexus N3K-C3064PQ vs juniper ex4500 in order to protect against ddos Matt Freitag (Sep 30)
- Re: nexus N3K-C3064PQ vs juniper ex4500 in order to protect against ddos Saku Ytti (Sep 30)