nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multicom Hijacks: Do you peer with these turkeys (AS35916)?
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:56:30 -0400
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 02:52:43AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
And of course, Mr. Stanciu's snowshoe spamming domains would not be maximally productive unless they each had SPF TXT records attached [...] https://pastebin.com/raw/BbK2YGe6
FYI, 85 of the 101 domains listed here are have been picked up by various spammer domain detection methods in place here. I have no doubt that the other 16 either will be in due course or simply reflect an inadequacy in my methods. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Multicom Hijacks: Do you peer with these turkeys (AS35916)? Ronald F. Guilmette (Aug 03)
- Re: Multicom Hijacks: Do you peer with these turkeys (AS35916)? Job Snijders (Aug 03)
- Re: Multicom Hijacks: Do you peer with these turkeys (AS35916)? Ken Chase (Aug 03)
- Re: Multicom Hijacks: Do you peer with these turkeys (AS35916)? Job Snijders (Aug 03)
- Re: Multicom Hijacks: Do you peer with these turkeys (AS35916)? Rich Kulawiec (Aug 03)
- Re: Multicom Hijacks: Do you peer with these turkeys (AS35916)? Yang Yu (Aug 03)