nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS PATH limits
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 22:45:07 +0000
William Herrin wrote:
The AS path lengths we're talking about are unreasonable.
"unreasonable" is a peculiar word to use here :-) It's the internet and you can't expect other people not to do silly things from time to time. This is a known problem and it isn't even the first time it's been discussed on nanog-l. If you've been hit with a known service-affecting problem that can easily recur without warning and which will be service affecting if it hits again, common sense suggests that it would be a good idea to upgrade to a version of code which isn't affected. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Mike Tancsa (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits William Herrin (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits William Herrin (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Baldur Norddahl (Dec 23)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AS PATH limits Scott Weeks (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits William Herrin (Dec 22)