nanog mailing list archives
Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:46:27 -0800
On 11/29/2017 02:40 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
You know what the original header was via the signature. You can take the delta of the current subject line and remove any additions and validate the signature. Whether you're happy with the additions is a different concern,On 11/29/2017 03:24 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:Message footers and subject lines can be dealt with. That's already been proven within the current DKIM spec.Please humor my ignorance and explain how a subject line (which is (over)signed) can be dealt with in the current DKIM spec?I get how footers can be dealt with, read appended. At least as long as DKIM only signs a given amount of the (original) body. (Though HTML (read: MIME structures) can complicate this.) - Or are you referring to something else?
If I were constructing a spam filter out of it, I'd give a lot of prejudice to anything added, but that's outside of
what you can do within the bounds of the spec. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM, (continued)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John R. Levine (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM valdis . kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Owen DeLong (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM bzs (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM valdis . kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Eric Kuhnke (Dec 01)
- RE: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Keith Medcalf (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Chuck Anderson (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)