nanog mailing list archives
Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon () orthanc ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:55:00 -0800
:: Isn't this the utopia we've been seeking out? I like that one! :-)
Seriously. If we run out of networks while handing out /48s, by migrating everything to HTTPS we can claw back the 16 bit 'port' field in the IP header and reassign it as part of the 140-bit IPv6.1 address space. Mind you, the FCC will likely auction off those extra 16 bits to Amazon, so you'll need a Prime membership to use them. --lyndon
Current thread:
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Scott Weeks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Scott Weeks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Scott Weeks (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Baldur Norddahl (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Gary Buhrmaster (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brian Kantor (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Baldur Norddahl (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 28)