nanog mailing list archives
Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:49:29 -0600 (CST)
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Rokeach" <jason () rokeach net> To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 12:46:57 PM Subject: Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites This looks pretty intentional to me. From http://www.cogentco.com/en/network/looking-glass : BGP routing table entry for 104.31.18.30/32 , version 611495773 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Local 10.255.255.255 (metric 10177050) from 154.54.66.21 (154.54.66.21) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 150, valid, internal, best Community: 174:990 174:20912 174:21001 Originator: 66.28.1.228, Cluster list: 154.54.66.21, 66.28.1.9 BGP routing table entry for 104.31.19.30/32 , version 611495772 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Local 10.255.255.255 (metric 10177050) from 154.54.66.21 (154.54.66.21) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 150, valid, internal, best Community: 174:990 174:20912 174:21001 Originator: 66.28.1.228, Cluster list: 154.54.66.21, 66.28.1.9 Call it a "hunch" but I doubt 10.255.255.255 is a valid next-hop router. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Mike Hammett < nanog () ics-il net > wrote: Have we determined that this is intentional vs. some screw up? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brielle Bruns" < bruns () 2mbit com > To: nanog () nanog org Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 12:28:53 PM Subject: Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites On 2/9/17 9:18 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
https://torrentfreak.com/internet-backbone-provider-cogent-blocks-pirate-bay-and-other-pirate-sites-170209/ /kc
Funny. Someone else got back: "Abuse cannot not provide you a list of websites that may be encountering reduced visibility via Cogent" I almost wish I had a Cogent circuit just to bring this up with an account rep. Almost. I'd very much so view this as a contractual violation on Cogent's part. Cogent keeps contacting me every year wanting to sell me service. This will be a good one to bring up when they call me next time. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
Current thread:
- backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Ken Chase (Feb 09)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Robert McKay (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Christopher Morrow (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Brielle Bruns (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Mike Hammett (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Jason Rokeach (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Mike Hammett (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Alistair Mackenzie (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Bryan Holloway (Feb 11)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Alistair Mackenzie (Feb 11)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Marco Teixeira (Feb 11)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Jason Canady (Feb 11)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites William Waites (Feb 11)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Jean-Francois Mezei (Feb 13)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Christopher Morrow (Feb 13)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Patrick Boyle via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Niels Bakker (Feb 14)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Mike Hammett (Feb 10)
- Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites Robert McKay (Feb 10)