nanog mailing list archives
Re: Apple Caching Server question
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:33:32 -0600 (CST)
There are far more ISPs with less than 10G of total traffic than ISPs with more than 10G of traffic. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "joel jaeggli" <joelja () bogus com> To: "lane powers" <lane.powers () swat coop>, nanog () nanog org Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 10:45:08 AM Subject: Re: Apple Caching Server question On 1/13/17 5:43 AM, lane.powers () swat coop wrote:
I saw the apple caching server mentioned on an earlier thread. Is this appropriate/functional/scaleable enough to implement as an ISP? It is an intriguing idea. From the docs I could find, I couldn't tell if it was only geared towards home / small business or if it could scale up to handle ISP level traffic.
It's a feature of macos server. You do get to register prefix with apple, but I don't imagine colocating a mac mini is isp level traffic. That said as714 peers extensively https://www.peeringdb.com/net/3554 so picking them up works too.
thanks, Lane
Current thread:
- Apple Caching Server question Lane Powers (Jan 12)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question lane . powers (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question joel jaeggli (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Mike Hammett (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Blake Hudson (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Fred Hicks (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Cody Grosskopf (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Luke Guillory (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question joel jaeggli (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Pete Mundy (Jan 16)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Theodore Baschak (Jan 16)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Pete Mundy (Jan 16)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question lane . powers (Jan 13)
- Re: Apple Caching Server question Justin Wilson (Jan 16)