Re: Reporting/fixing broken airport/hotel/etc wifi?

[Guillaume Tournat <guillaume () ironie org>]

Using sshd on port 443, I can ssh my box with a tunnel to a local squid. My browser then use this tunneled proxy to go 
to internet. 

Private and secure. 


> Le 14 juil. 2017 à 23:04, Ken Chase <math () sizone org> a écrit :
>
>
> This is exactly why i have SSHd on port 443 and 53 on one of my boxes/IPs. Once
> I got SSH sky's the limit on what I can fix/setup/tunnel.
>
> /kc
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:43:21PM -0700, Eric Kuhnke said:
> > I've found many times it's the other way around, with highly restrictive
> > captive portals that only allow traffic to 80 and 443. This is exactly the
> > reason why I have an OpenVPN server running in tcp mode (not udp) on 443.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Was there a list of folks collecting to provide fix actions for
> > > hotel/airport/etc?
> > >
> > > Seems that IAD / Washington Dulles don't like "random" tcp/443 sites on the
> > > internet?  173.194.205.129
> > >
> > > for instance, ping, traceroute, http but no https :(
> > > https works just fine from lots of other places on the tubes... just not
> > > the dulles wifi.
> > >
> > > -chris
>
> --
> Ken Chase - math () sizone org Guelph Canada