nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP peering question


From: David Hofstee <opentext.dhofstee () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:18:47 +0200

I would state that peering gives more control over the traffic you handle
(since it is not going over someone else's network). Every hop is a
possible problem to your operations, I guess.


David

On 12 July 2017 at 09:13, Wolfgang Tremmel <wolfgang.tremmel () de-cix net>
wrote:


On 11. Jul 2017, at 21:43, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:

Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
1) Are they present an IX where I am present?

2) Can they configure BGP correctly?

3) … Beer?


1) do they have a pulse?

4 ) are they in PeeringDB and keep their entry up to date? (especially the
contact information)

cheers,
Wolfgang


--
Wolfgang Tremmel

Phone +49 69 1730902 26 | Fax +49 69 4056 2716 | Mobile +49 171 8600 816
| wolfgang.tremmel () de-cix net
Geschaeftsfuehrer Harald A. Summa | Registergericht AG Köln HRB 51135
DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main |
Germany | www.de-cix.net





-- 
--
My opinion is mine.


Current thread: