nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
From: "Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:18:10 +0400
On 18 June 2017 at 17:36, Radu-Adrian Feurdean < nanog () radu-adrian feurdean net> wrote:
so for the record, business customers are much more active in *rejecting* IPv6, either explictely (they say they want it disabled) or implicitly (they install their own router, not configured for IPv6). The bigger the business, the bigger the chance of rejection.
Did they per chance state their reasons for rejecting it? -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mukom> | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ “When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- IPv6 traffic percentages? Bajpai, Vaibhav (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 18)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? Aaron Gould (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? fhr (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? Aaron Gould (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Mukom Akong T. (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Lee Howard (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Rod Beck (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jima (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 18)