nanog mailing list archives
Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 09:47:06 +0900
the use of rsync in RPKI is preventing a lot of large ISPs from implementing it (too difficult to provide redundancy with rsync).
uh, at least the DRL implementation supports caches feeding off of caches in (if you are silly enough) an arbitrarily complex graph. some years back, our research group actually used large clusters to emulate large deployments with multi-level caching and found it quite efficient. see Olaf Maennel, Iain Phillips, Debbie Perouli, Randy Bush, Rob Austein, and Askar Jaboldinov, "Towards a Framework for Evaluating BGP Security," CSET'12, 5th Workshop on Cyber Security Experimentation and Test. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/cset12/cset12-final19.pdf randy
Current thread:
- Financial services BGP hijack last week? valdis . kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Max Tulyev (May 02)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Nikos Leontsinis (May 02)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Job Snijders (May 02)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Compton, Rich A (May 02)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Christopher Morrow (May 02)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Compton, Rich A (May 03)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Christopher Morrow (May 03)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Job Snijders (May 02)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Randy Bush (May 02)
- Re: [NANOG] Nikos Leontsinis (May 04)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Mike Hammett (May 02)
- Old Long Haul Versus New Long Haul Fiber Rod Beck (May 02)
- Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week? Randy Bush (May 02)