Re: Should ISP block child pornography?

[Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo () gmail com>]

Agree


El 7/12/18 a las 06:14, Owen DeLong escribió:
> How is it that Interpol isn’t taking over/shutting down these domains
> in the DNS at the registry/registrar level?
>
> The GAC pushed hard for the provisions that allow them to do so and
> there’s a pretty clear (and quick) process for it.
>
> Owen
>
>
> > On Dec 6, 2018, at 22:06 , Lotia, Pratik M <Pratik.Lotia () charter com
> > <mailto:Pratik.Lotia () charter com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all, was curious to know the community’s opinion on whether an
> > ISP should block domains hosting CPE (child pornography exploitation)
> > content? Interpol has a ‘worst-of’ list which contains such domains
> > and it wants ISPs to block it.
> > On one side we want the ISP to not do any kind of censorship or
> > inspection of customer traffic (customers are paying for pipes – not
> > for filtered pipes), on the other side morals/ethics come into play.
> > Keep in mind that if an ISP is blocking it would mean that it is also
> > logging the information (source IP) and law agencies might be wanting
> > access to it.
> >  
> > Wondering if any operator is actively doing it or has ever considered
> > doing it?
> >  
> > Thanks.
> >  
> >  
> > With Gratitude,
> > * *
> > *Pratik Lotia*      
> >  
> > “Information is not knowledge.”
> > The contents of this e-mail message and 
> > any attachments are intended solely for the 
> > addressee(s) and may contain confidential 
> > and/or legally privileged information. If you
> > are not the intended recipient of this message
> > or if this message has been addressed to you 
> > in error, please immediately alert the sender
> > by reply e-mail and then delete this message 
> > and any attachments. If you are not the 
> > intended recipient, you are notified that 
> > any use, dissemination, distribution, copying,
> > or storage of this message or any attachment 
> > is strictly prohibited.