nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proving Gig Speed
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:37:08 -0700
--- mark.tinka () seacom mu wrote: From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> On 20/Jul/18 00:13, Scott Weeks wrote:
What I meant to say is a lot of folks get connectivity through satellite. 500msec plus and jitter to spare.
Would having local CDN caches help satellite-based providers? Sure... -------------------------------------- Could you explain that? Do you mean logically near the ground stations? I had a funny thought... CDN in the satellite. :) scott
Current thread:
- SV: Proving Gig Speed, (continued)
- SV: Proving Gig Speed Gustav Ulander (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Morgan A. Miskell (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Scott Weeks (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed nanog-isp (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Scott Weeks (Jul 19)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 19)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Scott Weeks (Jul 19)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Scott Weeks (Jul 19)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 20)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Scott Weeks (Jul 20)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 20)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Scott Weeks (Jul 20)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 20)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Stephen Satchell (Jul 21)