nanog mailing list archives

Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?


From: Stacy Hughes <ipgoddess () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:43:02 -0700

If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,  so very sorry.  Especially when it comes to v6.
Stacy 

On Jun 12, 2018, at 8:13 AM, McBride, Mack <C-Mack.McBride () charter com> wrote:

Allocations, not IPs.  And yes if they are reasonably static an excel spreadsheet can go higher.

Mack

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter.com () nanog org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 2:40 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: RE: What are people using for IPAM these days?



--- C-Mack.McBride () charter com wrote:
From: "McBride, Mack" <C-Mack.McBride () charter com>

If you are managing more than a thousand IPs allocations spreadsheets are not manageable for IPv4.
-----------------------------------------



I managed a /15, two /16s and several /24s (so, well 
over a quarter million IPs) on a spreadsheet for years.  
So, that's an 'it depends' answer.

scott
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain 
confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, 
distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.


Current thread: