nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 15:47:21 +0300
On 01/06/2018 15:24, niels=nanog () bakker net wrote:
* hank () efes iucc ac il (Hank Nussbacher) [Fri 01 Jun 2018, 06:56 CEST]:The entire whois debacle will only get resolved when some hackers attack www.eugdpr.org, ec.europa.eu and some other key .eu sites. When the response they get will be "sorry, we can't determine who is attacking you since that contravenes GDPR", will the EU light bulb go on that something in GDPR needs to be tweaked.Please stop inciting lawbreaking, and stop spreading long debunked talking points. Both are really inappropriate for this list. -- Niels.
The point was not to encourage law breaking. Sorry if that what was perceived. The point is that the people who designed GDPR did not take whois into consideration in the least. And we all will suffer because of that. -Hank
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit niels=nanog (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Hank Nussbacher (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Stephen Satchell (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit John Peach (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit niels=nanog (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Rodney Joffe (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Owen DeLong (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)