nanog mailing list archives
Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 19:00:13 -0400
On Jun 18, 2018, at 5:08 PM, Job Snijders <job () ntt net> wrote: Dear all, TL;DR: Perhaps it is time to add 2002::/16 to our EBGP bogon filters? It is kind of strange that in the default-free zone (where we don’t announce defaults to each other) - we will propagate what is effectively an IPv4 default-route, in the IPv6 DFZ. IETF has politely abandoned the prefix: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7526
I don’t believe there is a reason that folks should accept this prefix from a transit/peer. If they have need for 6to4 within their network, they should operate their own local 6to4 relays. It seems native IPv6 is fairly widely available: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html And there is almost zero 6to4 activity in those stats as well. Since it’s a known path for abuse as well, I would expect networks to not carry these IPv6 routes and filter them. - Jared
Current thread:
- Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Job Snijders (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Jared Mauch (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? joel jaeggli (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Nick Hilliard (Jun 19)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Job Snijders (Jun 28)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Jun 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? John Kristoff (Jun 18)
- RE: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? McBride, Mack (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Mark Andrews (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Ca By (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Mark Andrews (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Ca By (Jun 18)
- RE: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? McBride, Mack (Jun 18)