nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 12:09:28 +0200
On 22/Jun/18 10:00, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
The problem with its IPv6 support is that is only supporting 6in4, which by the way, they call it 6to4, so it is very weird and confusing customers ...
That "6-to-4 actually means 6-in-4" was quite confusing to me as well. I just enabled it to prove that they had a language moment there. Good thing it didn't backfire on me :-).
So for native IPv6 or a 6in4 tunnel, is fine, but any other transition mechanism is NOT supported, so we end up reflashing then with OpenWRT.
Not sure I'd blame them either - they develop a lot of features for pretty much next-to-nothing; and are being enabled by customers that are willing to take the risk for relief on budget. They could be more inclined to fix bugs and develop corner-case features sooner if they were in the premium market. But, as my (well-known on this list) American friend would say, "I conjecturbate" :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Ca By (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Job Snijders (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Jared Mauch (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Seth Mattinen (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Jeremy Austin (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Jared Mauch (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mike Hammett (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Jared Mauch (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Randy Bush (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Randy Bush (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Ben Cannon (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 25)