nanog mailing list archives

Re: How are you configuring BFD timers?


From: Jason Lixfeld <jason+nanog () lixfeld ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 13:10:53 -0400

A few years ago I did some testing and found that the time between the transceiver detecting LOS and the routing 
protocol (ISIS in this case) being informed that the link was down (triggering the recalculation) took longer than it 
took BFD to signal ISIS to recalculate.

On Mar 21, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net> wrote:

Wouldn't any tangible problem on a dark-fiber link result in an interface shutdown, ostensibly creating the trigger 
one would need to begin re-convergence?


On 3/21/18 11:31 AM, Alex Lembesis wrote:
To speed up BGP routing convergence.  The (2x) dark fiber links from PA to FL are being used as Layer3 datacenter 
interconnects, where each datacenter has its own AS.  The DF is also carrying FCIP traffic, so we need failover to 
be as fast as possible.
Best regards,
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Job Snijders (External) [mailto:job () instituut net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:25 PM
To: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
Cc: Alex Lembesis; NANOG
Subject: Re: How are you configuring BFD timers?
Silly question perhaps, but why would you do BFD on dark fiber?
Kind regards,
Job
This message is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary 
information and may be subject to attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a 
designated recipient you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please 
notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.


Current thread: