nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:17:15 -0400
On Mar 28, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Michael Crapse <michael () wi-fiber io> wrote: Many providers filter out 1.1.1.1 because too many people use it in their examples/test code. I doubt that it's a usable IP/service.
There’s at least one vendor *cough* cisco *cough* that has used it as captive portal IP. I’m not sure I would try to use it on a client machine because you don’t know if you’ll reach the internet. If you know you’re not on a closed network, you could use it instead of the list of usual suspects, like 8.8.8.8 4.2.2.1 9.9.9.9 etc. - Jared
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Seth Mattinen (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mark Milhollan (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? James R Cutler (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Igor Krneta (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Filip Hruska (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Eric Tykwinski (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Niels Bakker (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? nop (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mehmet Akcin (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jimmy Hess (Mar 31)