nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:39:50 +0200
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 08:29:57AM -0700, Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote a message of 53 lines which said:
there are ISPs who are internally capturing 8.8.8.8, and who try to do the same with 9.9.9.9. Which is why it’s so important to do cryptographic validation of the server and encryption of the transport, as well as DNSSEC validation.
And the good thing is that RFC 8310 has been published one week ago. I'm waiting for its deployment in Quad9 :-) https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8310
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Chip Marshall (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Doug Clements (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Izaac (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? John Kinsella (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Chris Adams (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Michael Crapse (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Alan Buxey (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jimmy Hess (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Baldur Norddahl (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Ken Chase (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephen Satchell (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? joel jaeggli (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Christopher Morrow (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Royce Williams (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Royce Williams (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 30)