nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 14:20:05 +0200
On 6/May/18 12:29, Nick Hilliard wrote:
one option potentially worth looking at here would be optimal route reflection. "Potentially" because vendors haven't been shipping ORR for long and some implementations are still working themselves through the design kink stage.
So our good friends at Cisco, after promising that they'd have code for IOS XE/CSR1000v by this time 2018, told me that implementation for it on this code base has moved to 2H'19, no guarantees. I'm too bored with them to even be irritated. Someone was telling me that the IOS XR implementation only supports the main IPv4/IPv6 address families, so their 6PE network cannot enjoy their ORR deployment yet. Mark.
Current thread:
- Route Reflector Client Design Question Erik Sundberg (May 03)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Spyros Kakaroukas (May 04)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Ca By (May 04)
- RE: Route Reflector Client Design Question michalis.bersimis (May 04)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question James Bensley (May 04)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Ahad Aboss (May 04)
- RE: Route Reflector Client Design Question Erik Sundberg (May 04)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Mark Tinka (May 05)
- RE: Route Reflector Client Design Question Erik Sundberg (May 05)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Nick Hilliard (May 06)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Mark Tinka (May 06)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Aaron Gould (May 06)
- Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Mark Tinka (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Route Reflector Client Design Question Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (May 04)