nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 19:38:25 -0400 (EDT)
No, but in the absence of a law that specifically bars the courts from doing so the will under current reciprocal treaty arrangements.
No, really, what treaties? I understand treaties about domesticating a tort judgement but this isn't a tort, this is a regulation.
R's, John PS:
can treaties supercede US law?
That question has a very complicated answer. tl;dr: sometimes
Current thread:
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news, (continued)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Dan Hollis (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Royce Williams (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Dan Hollis (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Owen DeLong (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news niels=nanog (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Stephen Satchell (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news niels=nanog (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Michel 'ic' Luczak (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Sander Steffann (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Dan Hollis (May 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news John Levine (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news jeff murphy (May 24)
- Re: GDPR outside Europe, was Whois vs GDPR, latest news John Levine (May 24)
- Re: GDPR outside Europe, was Whois vs GDPR, latest news K. Scott Helms (May 25)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news bzs (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Owen DeLong (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news K. Scott Helms (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mark Rousell (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Joly MacFie (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Constantine A. Murenin (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Rob Evans (May 17)