nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 20:28:08 +0200
On 5/26/18 8:15 PM, Michel 'ic' Luczak wrote:
The two levels depend on the nature of the infringement, but it says clearly “up to 10M” (or 2% of your worldwide revenue, whichever is bigger) for the “less serious” infringements. So no, there is no minimum fine actually.
To me that says the fine is 10M if your 2% is lower than 10M. Or it wasn't originally written in English and the translation is flawed.
Current thread:
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Anne P. Mitchell Esq. (May 24)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news K. Scott Helms (May 24)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Seth Mattinen (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Nick Hilliard (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Seth Mattinen (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Owen DeLong (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Rob McEwen (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Michel 'ic' Luczak (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Seth Mattinen (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Michel 'ic' Luczak (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Rob McEwen (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Rob McEwen (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Michel 'ic' Luczak (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Sander Steffann (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Anne P. Mitchell Esq. (May 28)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Dan Hollis (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Royce Williams (May 26)