nanog mailing list archives

Re: IGP protocol

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:34:14 +0200



On 9/Nov/18 17:03, im wrote:


  1. what is your backbone's IGP protocol?


IS-IS.

  2. why you choose it?


Main reasons:

    - Stringy, i.e., no "all must pay taxes to Area 0" decree.
    - Integrated for IPv4 and IPv6.
    - Doesn't run over IP.

Mark.

Current thread:

Re: IGP protocol, (continued)
- Re: IGP protocol Jared Mauch (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Ryan Kearney via NANOG (Nov 12)
- RE: IGP protocol Naslund, Steve (Nov 12)
  - Re: IGP protocol valdis . kletnieks (Nov 12)
    - RE: IGP protocol Naslund, Steve (Nov 12)
  - Re: IGP protocol Job Snijders (Nov 12)
  - Re: IGP protocol Brandon Martin (Nov 12)
    - Re: IGP protocol Aled Morris via NANOG (Nov 13)
    - Re: IGP protocol Tashi Phuntsho (Nov 14)
    - Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
  - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
    - Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 14)
    - Re: IGP protocol Baldur Norddahl (Nov 14)
    - SV: IGP protocol Gustav Ulander (Nov 14)
    - Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 15)
  - Re: IGP protocol Alain Hebert (Nov 13)
    - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
    - Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Alfie Pates (Nov 18)

(Thread continues...)