nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service)
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:58:55 -0400
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:53:47 -0000, David Hubbard said:
Yep we pay it on our circuits, begrudgingly. Wouldnât mind it as much if it actually delivered me every BGP prefix in the global routing tableâ¦
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:49:10 -0400, Jason Canady said:
I believe IPv6 BGP is free.
Draw your own conclusions... :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Josh Luthman (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Jason Canady (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) David Hubbard (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) valdis . kletnieks (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Jeff Waddell (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Brielle Bruns (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Josh Luthman (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) David Hubbard (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Anderson, Charles R (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Josh Luthman (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Ben Cannon (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Josh Luthman (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) H I Baysal (Oct 19)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Jeff Waddell (Oct 19)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Dovid Bender (Oct 19)