nanog mailing list archives
Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor?
From: "Montgomery, Douglas \(Fed\) via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:30:35 +0000
Michel, The GoRTR services that cloudflare speaks of below might be an example of an organization positioned to offer the kind of services you suggest. https://blog.cloudflare.com/rpki-details/ dougm -- Doug Montgomery, Manager Internet & Scalable Systems Research @ NIST On 9/18/18, 4:46 PM, "Michel Py" <michel.py () tsisemi com> wrote: > Second, in general our mission is limited to supporting the development and promulgation of consensus standards and the development of test / measurement methods > and guidanceto accelerate their adoption. In particular we are not well positioned to provide operational Internet services of the nature you describe. You provide critical time services, this would be nothing compared to it.
Current thread:
- adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? nusenu (Sep 17)
- Re: adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? Job Snijders (Sep 17)
- Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? Montgomery, Douglas (Fed) (Sep 17)
- RE: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? Michel Py (Sep 17)
- Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? Montgomery, Douglas (Fed) (Sep 18)
- RE: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? Michel Py (Sep 18)
- Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? Montgomery, Douglas (Fed) via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? Montgomery, Douglas (Fed) (Sep 17)
- Re: adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor? Job Snijders (Sep 17)