nanog mailing list archives
Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 02:18:08 +0200
fre. 31. aug. 2018 17.16 skrev Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>:
I would love an upstream that accepts flowspec routes to get granular about drops and to basically push "stateless ACLs" upstream. _keeps dreaming_
We just need a signal to drop UDP for a prefix. The same as RTBH but only for UDP. This would prevent all volumetric attacks without the end user being cut off completely. Besides from some games, VPN and VoIP, they would have an almost completely normal internet experience. DNS would go through the ISP servers and only be affected if the user is using a third party service. Regards Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Baldur Norddahl (Sep 01)
- RE: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Ryan Hamel (Sep 01)
- Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Hugo Slabbert (Sep 01)
- RE: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Michel Py (Sep 01)
- Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Baldur Norddahl (Sep 02)
- RE: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Ryan Hamel (Sep 02)
- Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Baldur Norddahl (Sep 02)
- RE: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Ryan Hamel (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Roland Dobbins (Sep 01)
- Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Roland Dobbins (Sep 01)
- Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Roland Dobbins (Sep 01)
- Re: automatic rtbh trigger using flow data Hugo Slabbert (Sep 01)