Re: OpenDNS CGNAT Issues

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:06 PM Jerry Cloe <jerry () jtcloe net> wrote:

> OpenDNS, or anyone for that matter, should never see 100.64/10 ip's. If
> they do, something is wrong at the source, and OpenDNS wouldn't be able to
> reply anyway (or at least have the reply route back to the user).

maybeopendns peers directly with such an eyeball network? and in that case
maybe they have an agreement to accept traffic from the 100.64 space?


> -----Original message-----
> *From:* Aled Morris via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
> *Sent:* Tue 09-11-2018 11:57 am
> *Subject:* Re: OpenDNS CGNAT Issues
> *To:* cb.list6 () gmail com;
> *CC:* NANOG <nanog () nanog org>;
>
> Incidentally, I hope OpenDNS considers 100.64.0.0/10 as space that can't
> be registered to any end-user.
>
> Aled