nanog mailing list archives
Re: Special Counsel Office report web site
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:23:55 +0000
Rich, If you want NANOG to devolve into a morass of political claptrap, keep posting comments like that. Personally, I want NANOG to remain a useful technical resource, and leave the partisan crap to Facebook and its ilk. -mel beckman
On Apr 18, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote:On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:02:52PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted [...]Not quite. A *version* of the report that has been redacted by the President's hand-picked obedient lackey will be posted. I suspect that the full report will find its way to us via other means. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site, (continued)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Martin Hannigan (Apr 17)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Jared Mauch (Apr 18)
- RE: Special Counsel Office report web site Naslund, Steve (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Mel Beckman (Apr 18)
- We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Apr 18)
- Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site) John Levine (Apr 18)
- Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Apr 18)
- RE: Special Counsel Office report web site Kain, Rebecca (.) (Apr 18)
- P2P [was: Special Counsel Office report web site] Rich Kulawiec (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Mel Beckman (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Marco Belmonte (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Randy Bush (Apr 18)