Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation (fwd)

[Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>]

There are factual errors in the ARIN meeting minutes. It really is a disservice that people on the AC don’t have facts 
about ARIN and the function of their routing registry (for example).

It would be good if the ARIN AC had people that were more aware of the functions ARIN provides. 

If you control vote of resources by ARIN I encourage you to use this as part of your process. 

Sent from my iCar

> On Apr 26, 2019, at 12:47 PM, Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:41:18AM -0500, Matt Harris wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Can you (or someone else on the list, perhaps even someone who was involved
> > in voting this down) provide some more details as to why it was rejected?
> > What were the arguments in favor of rejecting the proposal?  This seems
> > like an interesting idea to me, and one that I can't immediately come up
> > with any arguments against from my own perspective.  There's probably some
> > room for discussing and tuning specifics, but ultimately the concept seems
> > reasonable to me.  What am I missing here?
>
> Speaking solely for myself, it would be reasonable to start
> any discussion based upon the on-record rationales for its
> rejection.  As such I would direct interested parties to the 
> Draft Advisory Council Meeting minutes from April 10
> https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/ac/meetings/2019_0410/
>
> and most specifically on that page
> "16. ARIN-Prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation"
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joe
>
> -- 
> Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
> Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling