nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mx204 alternative
From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen () network1 net>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 00:46:04 -0400 (EDT)
If you don't require redundant routing engines, there is nothing from Juniper that will cost less and have the capacity you require. In fact, there really aren't any cheaper MX options at all, other than the kneecapped MX80 and MX104 variants. MX204 is really a nice box. I only wish they had a redundant version. Is price your only concern with the MX204? You might not need the full blown -R or -IR version, so the list price would only be ~$45K. I'm not too familiar with other vendors, so I'll leave that to others. thanks, -Randy ----- On Aug 7, 2019, at 11:02 PM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net> wrote:
Greetings,
I am looking for some suggestions on alternatives to mx204.
Any recommendations on something more affordable which can handle full routing tables from two providers?
Prefer Juniper but happy to look alternatives. Min 6-8 10G ports are required 1G support required
Thanks in advance!
Mehmet -- Mehmet +1-424-298-1903
Current thread:
- Re: Mx204 alternative, (continued)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Tarko Tikan (Aug 08)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Aug 07)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mehmet Akcin (Aug 07)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Aaron (Aug 09)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Aug 09)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Aaron (Aug 09)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Aug 09)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Stephen Fulton (Aug 10)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Aug 10)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Baldur Norddahl (Aug 07)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Randy Carpenter (Aug 08)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Forrest Christian (List Account) (Aug 09)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Jared Mauch (Aug 10)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Aug 08)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Aug 08)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Aug 09)